Monday, 26 January 2026

Alfredo / Armando Mei's 36400BC

               Amazon                 


Alfredo (often published as Armando) Mei promotes a pseudo-archaeological theory claiming that the Giza pyramids and associated structures predate dynastic Egypt by tens of thousands of years and originate from a lost, advanced prehistoric civilization. His speculative reconstruction of deep human prehistory seeks to align ancient mythological narratives with selected geological and climatological events.

Central to his argument is the claim that the Giza pyramids do not belong to the dynastic period of ancient Egypt but instead originate in a remote primordial epoch identified with Zep Tepi (“the First Time”), which he dates to approximately 36,400 BCE.

His date for this Zep Tepi was originally derived from proposed astronomical alignments. To this he now adds interpretations of satellite-based remote sensing data, which he argues reveal architectural features predating known Egyptian civilization. On this basis, Mei posits the existence of a technologically advanced global civilization that flourished tens of thousands of years ago and was subsequently destroyed by catastrophic natural events, surviving only in fragmentary mythological traditions.

A pivotal component of his framework is the Toba supereruption, conventionally dated to approximately 74,000–75,000 years before present (BP), which is widely recognized in the geological record as one of the largest volcanic events of the Quaternary period. While the severity of its climatic and demographic consequences remains debated among palaeoclimatologists and anthropologists, some models propose that the eruption may have contributed to a temporary reduction in human population size, often described as a genetic “bottleneck.” Mei interprets this event not merely as an environmental catastrophe but as a civilizational collapse, which he associates with later mythological traditions concerning lost lands such as Atlantis, Lemuria, and Mu.

I really do not understand the logic of this argument. There is a significant chronological discontinuity within his framework. The proposed eruption of Toba at approximately 75,000 BP precedes Mei’s proposed construction date for the Giza monuments (36,400 BCE) by nearly 40,000 years, a temporal gap for which he provides no coherent mechanism of cultural transmission, technological continuity, or archaeological evidence. Consequently, the only conclusion one can reach is that his speculative link between this volcanic event and the emergence of a highly developed architectural tradition several tens of millennia later remains at best theoretically underdeveloped and empirically unsupported. This chronological inconsistency highlights a broader methodological reliance on associative reasoning rather than actual evidence.

Here's the blurb for his 2025 book:
36,400 BCE – The Secrets of the Gods:
A Research-Based Investigation into the Origins of Human Civilization

What if key aspects of human civilization did not emerge gradually, but instead originated from a much earlier and more advanced cultural framework?

In 36,400 BCE – The Secrets of the Gods, independent researcher Armando Mei presents a structured investigation into the deep past of human civilization, focusing on archaeological evidence from the Giza Plateau and its surrounding context. Drawing on field observations, architectural analysis, and satellite-based remote sensing data, this book challenges conventional chronological assumptions without resorting to speculative or mythological narratives.

This book explores:
Architectural and spatial anomalies at Giza that resist conventional explanations
Evidence suggesting advanced planning, metrology, and structural logic
The implications of non-invasive satellite technologies (SAR) in archaeological research
The possibility of a lost pre-dynastic cultural horizon predating known civilizations
Unlike many works in the field of alternative history, this study avoids symbolic interpretations and focuses instead on physical constraints, architectural coherence, and verifiable methodological frameworks.

Here we go Again: Giza Scan Scam Prolongued

                                     .                                      

Instead of sitting down and writing up the SAR Doppler tomography scans that allegedly revealed the massive shafts and chambers under Khafre's Pyramid at Giza (Nicole Ciccolo's "Under-Khafre-Pyramid-Scan-Scam" the Khafre Project), Dr Filippo Biondi has apparently "written a book" and to plug this, he's going the rounds of the YouTube podcasters giving interviews. So here he is on the " PowerfulJRE podcast" (Joe Rogan Experience #2443 Jan 23, 2026 - Filippo Biondi, 127min). He also appeared on Hugh Newman's MegalithomaniaUK podcast (Dr Filippo Biondi, Armando Mei & Trevor Grassi, 77 minutes)

It is not clear what happened to thre third member of the original team [Filippo Biondi, Armando Mei, and Corrado Malanga]

An exclusive Megalithomania interview with Armando Mei and Filippo Biondi of the Khafre Research Project analysing the brand new scientific SAR scan data that has revealed that all three pyramids on the Giza Plateau have massive underground features, including the Sphinx. We also talk to Trevor Grassi who has been researching the Giza underground for several years. This is the full up-to-date story of what is going on beneath the pyramids at Giza with discoveries that may change history as we know it.
I think it is a scam. Flint Dibble has produced a video showing why he thinks it is a scam. We are not alone, a number of colleagues from different fields have looked at what the Ciccolo team has produced so far, and clearly coonsiders that not enough has been shown so far to convince them at the moment that it has any evidential value. This is why the actual backup data need to be presented for peer review. A you Tube video is NOT that publication.

So, now we find him doubling down. "MediaMind" Journalist Holden Culotta ( @Holden_Culotta 25/01/2026) seems convinced:
“If this is true, this rewrites history.”
Filippo Biondi just blew Joe Rogan’s mind with what he discovered beneath the pyramids:
Massive shafts that go 2,000 feet down. And they connect to “huge chambers” deep underground. There are shafts and chambers below the Sphinx, too.

This may be the best evidence yet that the pyramids and the Sphinx were built by an advanced ancient civilization.

Biondi. “Currently, the shafts are blocked by debris, and there is rubbish inside.” “I performed a lot of scans at those shafts, and you see the shafts go down, down and they reach chambers that are below.”
Rogan: “How far do they go down?”
Biondi: “Approximately 600 meters.”
Rogan: “Wow.”
“So it’s not just under the Great Pyramid, it’s under all three pyramids.”
Biondi: “And also the Sphinx.”
Rogan: “And they all have chambers at the bottom of them?”
Biondi: “Yes.”
“At the end of the structures of these tubes … there are huge chambers.”
Rogan: “How huge?”
Biondi: “80 meters times 80 meters and times 80 meters of height.”
Rogan: “And that’s uniform underneath all of the pyramids? It’s the same dimensions?”
Biondi: “Yes.”
Gosh, eh? How exciting (if true)!

So, ground truthing. These shafts are "20 m diameter" and "600 metres in depth. At the bottom of each is an 80 x80 x80m chamber. If it really existed in that form, EACH shaft would produce approximately 391,372 cubic metres of loose rock rubble. The spoil heap FROM EACH SHAFT would require a base diameter of approximately 416 m if 50m tall, or approximately 138.8 m if 150m tall (using a bulking factor of 1.5 and an angle of repose of about 40 degrees. So where is all this dug-out rock, Dr Biondi?

Let us see a proper final publication.
 
But in the meantime, they've produced another interim  plan - this one I call the "Bigger Bollocks Giza Plan". 


They go further in this one

Another view:
Great Pyramid in the background (from a 'forthcoming scientific publication')





The "Mysterious" Split Boulder of Al-Naslaa


The Al-Naslaa rock formation is a remarkable geological and archaeological site located in north-western Saudi Arabia, in the Tabuk region near the Tayma oasis ( 27°13'45.78"N  38°34'18.14"E). First documented in 1883 by Charles Huber, the formation consists of two massive sandstone blocks, approximately nine meters high and seven and a half meters wide, separated by an exceptionally straight vertical fracture which has attracted attention amongst pseudoscientists.

The dominant explanation for the formation of this fracture involves natural geological processes. The rock has been separated along a joint, the natural split beint widened by freeze–thaw weathering, in which water infiltrates small cracks in the rock, freezes and expands, gradually enlarging the fissure over extended periods. Repeated cycles of freezing and melting, combined with wind-driven sand erosion in the desert environment, could account for both the separation of the rock and the smoothness of the fracture surfaces. Seismic activity may also have contributed by expanding pre-existing structural weaknesses within the sandstone.

In addition to its unusual geological features, Al-Naslaa is notable for the presence of prehistoric petroglyphs carved into its surface. These engravings depict animals, human figures, and abstract motifs, providing valuable evidence of the symbolic practices and daily activities of early inhabitants of the region. Animal figures may reflect hunting traditions and the former biodiversity of the area, while human figures often appear in dynamic scenes that suggest ritual, dance, or communal activities. The abstract symbols are generally interpreted as expressions of spiritual or symbolic belief systems. Together, these petroglyphs constitute part of an important archaeological record that contributes to broader understanding of prehistoric culture and social organization in north-western Arabia.

I have said it before (at least once in the context of the submerged Yonaguni formation) that there needs to be more attention paid to the phenomenon of jointing in rock masses in Pseudoarchaeology School. 


Monday, 19 January 2026

Atlantean Boulders

New terminology? Why?


What are the defining features that differentiate these walls from Cyclopean walls - a term already in widespread use? Why duplicate terminology if there is already a perfectly good label in common use?

Thursday, 15 January 2026

Who is 'Megalithic Mysteries': @Megalithic12000?

The social media account 'Megalithic Mysteries' ( @Megalithic12000 1,446 Followers) claims to specialise in " Ancient precision. Lost civilisations. Cataclysms that reset humanity" and wants us to believe that he knows what he is talking about when he says: "History is far older and stranger than you think". Following through the inter-links with his other online activity you see someone rather deperate for attention and online engagement. It turns out this is somebody who makes films elsewhere going by the name Francis Mobberley and he's from Kings Lynn, United Kingdom. Mr Mobbedry seems never to have read an archaeology book, but is full of trite stereotypical statements about "what the archaeologists get wrong".

Some recent gems:

" The mysterious site of Sayhuite in Peru shows astonishing evidence of destruction. Can you even begin to imagine the forces required to break this piece in two? ... did something tremendously violent take place here?".... "
Gobekli Tepe alone should have rewritten the entire story of human origins....Yet rather than update the timeline, orthodoxy simply changed the definition of the term hunter gatherer so the theory could stay intact"....
"ANCIENT ENGINEERING MYSTERY I’m calling on archaeologists, engineers and anyone who thinks they can, to explain this mystery ONCE AND FOR ALL. Mainstream academia claims to understand how ancient precision-engineered stone was made...."
" Peruvian local tells me ALIENS built the megaliths. I’m currently in Peru. This clip is from an Uber ride today.... Some, like this gentleman here, believe beings from elsewhere helped humanity rebuild after a great cataclysm, when civilisation and infrastructure were lost".
"Early accounts in Egypt show temples buried, huge stones shifted, severe erosion, and widespread ruin long before restoration began. This is not gradual decay. It points to powerful ancient destruction. The clues remain, if you know how to read them".
"Many people fail to grasp the severity of the Younger Dryas cataclysm. ... Only the hardest stone survives a planetary disaster. Everything else is wiped clean".
"Ancient builders crafted stones with a precision that challenges modern machinery. Did you know that to this day, no one has provided an explanation for how this stone was shaped with such precision?"
"UNSOLVED MYSTERY: No one on the planet can explain this method of removing stone. From Peru to Egypt, ancient sites display the exact same anomalous precision and engineering approaches. This suggests a shared knowledge that no existing explanation fully accounts for."
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@Megalithic12000
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61585609156961