The YouTube channel "EXPEDITION -Nicole Ciccolo-"

  

Nicole Ciccolo

                                                .                                          

In order to understand the background to the Italian Under-Pyramid Scan Story, we need to look at the venue where it was first announced at a long conference organised by the Italian language group formed around the YouTube channel "EXPEDITION Nicole Ciccolo". This channel (formed Nov 15, 2012) is hosted by Nicole Ciccolo a prominent graphologist based in Bologna, Italy, specializing in forensic graphology within civil and penal frameworks. The membership group focuses on exploring topics from the origins of the universe to the mysteries of ancient civilizations and contemporary issues.The channel’s mix of videos of various format, for example live streams, long-form conferences (some exceeding 3 hours), and shorter messages caters to both casual viewers and dedicated followers, with members-only content suggesting a loyal subscriber base. The content leans toward the mysterious, unconventional, and thought-provoking, often questioning official narratives (e.g., "La Vera Storia Dell'Umanita"). It’s presented as an intellectual and exploratory "expedition," aligning with the channel’s stated mission of fostering open dialogue and freedom of thought. The channel’s description emphasizes it as a "journey in the writing of time," aiming to raise awareness about humanity’s place in the "great ocean that is the mystery of Life." It aims to promote open dialogue and freedom of thought, which it asserts that it considers these to be "sacred and inviolable". The channel covers a wide array of topics, blending ancient history, alternative archaeology, ufology, spirituality, geopolitics, and consciousness exploration and it positions itself as an exploratory platform, inviting viewers to join in a collective "expedition" (hence the name) through knowledge and consciousness.  

The channel often features discussions with various guests. Some notable names mentioned in the channel’s description include Corrado Malanga, Armando Mei, Giuliana Conforto, Alessandro De Angelis, Loretta Bolgan, Massimo Citro, Silver Nervuti, and Gianmarco Landi. This mix of experts or commentators is drawn from from diverse fields, leaning toward alternative or unconventional perspectives often diverging from mainstream narratives. The format of the video presentations that the channel broadcasts are a mix of live streams, conferences, and discussions, with some content reserved for members, pointing to a community-driven approach. 

In general, view counts tend to be modest, some videos get only a few hundred viewers. Recent high-viewership content (e.g., the Giza conference with 200K views in 6 days) shows strong audience engagement with fresh, sensational (and widely advertised through the press) claims like a city beneath the pyramids. The video titles use hashtags extensively (e.g., #Giza, #expedition_nicoleciccolo), indicating a social media-savvy approach to visibility. 

Key Categories and Insights

Ancient Civilizations and Alternative Archaeology  
Titles like "Conferenza: Giza - Le piramidi e la porta del tempo" (200K views, 6 days ago) and "Comunicato stampa.. Piana di Giza: Scoperta una citta' sotto le Piramidi" (28K views, 1 month ago) highlight a strong interest in Egyptology, particularly the Giza Plateau. The channel seems to promote theories about hidden cities or time-related secrets tied to the pyramids, featuring guests like Armando Mei and Filippo Biondi alongside Corrado Malanga "Gli Antichi Dei: i simboli occulti"  delves into esoteric interpretations of ancient deities and symbols constitutes a narrative of lost or suppressed knowledge.

Ufology and Extraterrestrial Life 
Videos such as "Esobiologia: La vita oltre la terra" (29K views, 5 months ago) and "Relazioni tra Terrestri ed Extraterrestri" (4.2K views, 2 weeks ago) indicate a significant focus on extraterrestrial phenomena. Corrado Malanga, a recurring figure known for his work on alien abductions and regressive hypnosis, ties this theme to his research on abductions (e.g., "Corrado Malanga: O.B:E.", 27K views, 3 months ago). "Sfere Aliene o Droni nei Cieli" (3.6K views, 2 months ago) explores modern sightings, blending ufology with apocalyptic undertones ("La fine dei tempi?").

Spirituality and Consciousness 
Titles like "Contattare L'Energia Cristica con L'Ipnosi Spirituale" (1.4K views, 1 month ago) and "La Mente Universale e Miracoli" (1.1K views, 10 months ago) reflect an exploration of spiritual practices, consciousness expansion, and metaphysical concepts. Angela Francia’s series ("Momenti per l’anima") covers topics like spiritism, biorisonance, and numerology, appealing to viewers interested in holistic and esoteric spirituality.

Geopolitics and Societal Commentary
Gianmarco Landi’s appearances, such as "Razza Schiava #7 Gianmarco Landi Come ci manipolano col denaro" (8.7K views, 6 months ago) and "Chi fa Scacco al Mondo Interio?" (11K views, 8 days ago), involve a critical take on global power structures, finance, and manipulation. Nicole Ciccolo’s personal messages (e.g., "Potere e Corruzione", 5K views, 3 years ago) offer her own reflections on societal issues like corruption, war, and disobedience.

Current Events and Expeditions
Live streams like "Live dal Cairo: Tour Egitto Svelato" (multiple dates, 20K-22K views, 3 weeks ago) concern on-the-ground explorations tied to the Giza discoveries, reinforcing the channel’s "expedition" branding.

Recurring Guests and Their Roles

Corrado Malanga: A central figure, known for abduction research, appearing in discussions on Giza, ancient symbols, ufology, and consciousness (e.g., "L'Anello al NASA: come andare su marte a piedi"). His involvement lends a speculative, fringe-science flavour.

Armando Mei: Frequently paired with Malanga, focusing on Egyptology and ancient mysteries, contributing historical or archaeological interpretations.

Filippo Biondi: Appears in Giza-related content as a collaborator in these investigations.

Gianmarco Landi: Brings geopolitical and financial analysis, broadening the channel’s scope.

Angela Francia: Offers spiritual and esoteric insights, appealing to a niche audience interested in the "invisible."

Conclusion

"EXPEDITION -Nicole Ciccolo-" is a multifaceted platform that blends alternative history, ufology, spirituality, and societal critique, hosted by Nicole Ciccolo and featuring a roster of recurring contributors like Corrado Malanga and Armando Mei. Its appeal lies in its bold, speculative takes on ancient mysteries (especially Giza), extraterrestrial life, and human consciousness, delivered through lengthy discussions and live expeditions. 

Giza - The Pyramids and the Temporal Gateway Conference 16th March 2025

This is about a video that provides quite a useful summary of the long conference presenting "Le piramidi e la porta del tempo [Giza - The Pyramids and the Temporal Gateway]" with massive underground structures supposedly discovered under the Khafre pyramid by remote sense=sing. The author of the video summary (You Tuber Raffaello Urbani, an Italian creator known for his focus on [real] history, languages, video games, but also medieval weapons and armour) sets out to meticulously dissect and summarise the whole thing in a 35 minute delivery.

This conference lasted nearly four hours and was held on March 16, 2025, at the Hotel Artem Congress. It featured three speakers— Armando Meli, Filipo Bjondi, and Corado Malanga and was presented on the YouTube channel "Expedition Nicole Chicolo".  

      Pottymouth pseudoarchaeologist            

              professor, Corado Malanga   

       

As a native Italian speaker, the author watched the entire event, which drew 900 spectators and sold out tickets, and in this video aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of every word, sentence, rhetorical flourish, and claim made during the proceedings. The goal is to unpack how the speakers presented their findings (allegedly groundbreaking revelations about "hidden truths no one else dared to investigate") down to the minutest detail, while maintaining an open mind despite the questionable context surrounding the event. The author clarifies what was actually said, separating fact from the sensationalized sci-fi interpretations (like pyramids as power plants or underground cities) that have since circulated on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, often without scrutiny. Specifically, the author examines the speakers’ references to the "city of Amenti", the justifications for their claims (noting the first speaker’s completely “ludicrous” numerological reasoning), and an alternative purpose for the pyramids proposed by Malanga, the final and most prominent speaker. With a mix of sarcasm and sincerity, the author delivers an unflinching, detailed breakdown of the conference’s content, presentation, and underlying implications, all while highlighting the historical weight the organizers themselves attributed to it, hyperbolic claims of rewriting humanity’s remote past.

I Watched The 4 Hours Conference Of The Pyramids Of Giza In Italian...It's WILD!

.

Posted on You Tube by Metatron 82,998 views Mar 29, 2025 

In it, Raffaello Urbani launches into a scathing critique of the first speaker, Armando Meli, whose presentation begins at minute 11:34 of the original Italian video and stretches over an hour and two minutes, earning him the distinction of being the author’s least favourite of the three. Tasked with introducing the origins of their research project on the Giza plateau, Meli instead delivered a chaotic mess of metaphysical musings—rambling about spirit, mind, and destiny— rather than a coherent foundation or presentation of the project. Urbani finds his methodology utterly disjointed and his rhetoric abysmal, exemplified by his claim that meeting the other researchers was no mere chance but a pre-ordained event, as “chance doesn’t exist”, a statement he just tosses out. 

Meli’s wild assertions escalate as he casually re-dates the structures on the Giza plateau to 36,400 BC, offering only a flimsy justification about considering “other temples” beyond the pyramids and Sphinx, with no further elaboration. His presentation grows increasingly unhinged as he declares a sarcophagus to be a 'bathtub' without explanation, then pivots to decoding the “civilization’s” communication through numbers, despite no evidence of a civilization existing at that time. Focusing on the Valley Temple, May concocts a bizarre numerical interpretation—arbitrarily assigning meaning to a corridor as “three,” 16 columns as “seven,” and a niche as “one”—to arrive at “137,” which he later flips to “371” as an “anagram” symbolizing “the transcendent form of man reincarnating,” a leap the Urbani deems dishonest and nonsensical. He further ties these fabricated numbers, like 432, to spacetime and immortality, claiming they hint at something beneath Giza, a conclusion built on cherry-picked elements and wild speculation. When Meli introduces the "Emerald Tablets" and the "City of Amenti"— dismissing academia’s skepticism as a cover-up— his team’s amateurish reinterpretation of the texts reeks of modern pseudo-New Age projection, devoid of linguistic or historical rigour. The author excoriates May’s approach as unprofessional, accusing him of projecting baseless modern ideas onto ancient contexts to prop up his ludicrous claim of a hidden city, leaving the presentation a shambles of unjustified leaps and interpretive chaos.

The  second speaker, Filipo Bjondi, has a presentation kicks off at 1 hour and 4 minutes and drags on until 1 hour and 52 minutes, earning him the title of the “best” of the trio— though this is faint praise, as the author deems these 50 minutes the most tedious of the conference, especially after the first speaker’s disastrous introduction.

Bjondi focuses on the technology behind their claims, boasting of a novel technique using two low-orbit satellites to generate SAR imaging, but with a twist: instead of conventional methods, they employ sonar— sound vibrations captured from space and interpreted with AI assistance. Urbani, while admitting to be no tech expert, finds this explanation riddled with issues, starting with Bjondi’s use of grandiose jargon that obscures a shaky foundation. He claims this method allows unprecedented underground scans, but Urbani is skeptical, noting that the logical process tying the tech to their conclusions is flimsy and unconvincing. 

At 1 hour and 20 minutes, Bjondi veers into a bizarre tangent, declaring “the heretic thought always wins” (linking “error” to “air” and “liberty” in a nonsensical etymological leap the author dismisses as fabricated fluff). On the technical front, he describes transmitting electromagnetic impulses to capture echoes from beneath the earth, yet when he addresses validation at 1 hour and 44 minutes, the author finds it sorely lacking. Bjondi cites tests on the Grand Sasso tunnels and the Mosul Dam, claiming their scans accurately mapped known pathways and tunnels—pointing to visuals of blue lines and red zones allegedly corresponding to real structures. However, Urbani tears into this as insufficient proof: Bjondi never specifies the depth of these scans, a critical omission when they later claim to detect structures 648 to 1,200 meters beneath Giza! Without altitude data or evidence of precision at such depths, the author finds the methodology unprofessional and the presentation a dull, unpersuasive slog— failing to bridge the gap between intriguing tech and credible results, leaving their bold claims dangling without rigour or substance., 

The author then addresses the presentation of the third speaker, Corado Malanga, the supposed “big guy” of the conference. His presentation begins at 1 hour and 52 minutes and quickly spirals into a mix of absurdity and unprofessionalism that the author finds both fascinating and deeply flawed. Malanga starts by admitting he and his team initially understood nothing from their sonar-derived satellite images, relying on colours to indicate vibrations, materials, and depths. His methodology takes a nosedive at 2 hours and 33 minutes when he identifies underground structures shaped like tuning forks (“diapason”), linking this to their sonar technique in a leap of “fate” the author deems laughably unprofessional—suggesting ancient intent from 36,400 years ago guided this discovery.

Malanga’s claims grow wilder as he describes empty “glass” tubes, calculated at 648 meters deep based on a stretched pyramid image and pixel ratios, a process the author finds dubious and poorly explained (especially his casual “a pixel is a pixel” dismissal). At 2 hours and 55 minutes, he introduces the technique's overreliance on AI to interpret results, asserting it is somehow immune to biases and flaws and thus validates their shapes (tubes, cubes) as real. The author excoriates this as a lazy cop-out, noting Malanga’s naive belief that “AI never gets anything wrong,” repeated thrice, betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of AI’s interpretive limits. 

Malanga’s numerology adds to the chaos, tying 648 meters to 324 (space-time axes) and 162 (near the golden ratio), which the author dismisses as baseless number-juggling akin to the first speaker’s antics. Finally, at 3 hours and 9 minutes, he posits these “cubes” as the “rooms of Amenti,” claiming at 3 hours and 27 minutes they’re structural supports preventing the pyramid’s sinking—a theory lacking evidence or rigour. He says that the black square at the complex’s base might be tungsten, a bold assertion he justifies solely by its colour and lack of vibration, offering no substantive evidence. By 3 hours and 47 minutes, his speculative leaps continue unchecked, culminating in a sales pitch for signed books as the conference wraps up, a move the author notes with skepticism given the presenters’ financial incentives.

The author paints Malanga’s presentation as a trainwreck of interpretive overreach, sloppy execution, and unjustified confidence, propped up by misused tech and conspiracy-laden bluster, leaving his grand conclusions unconvincing and his status as the “genius” thoroughly undermined.

Urbani then sums up the entire conference with a blend of intrigue and scathing critique, reflecting on its esoteric tone and glaring methodological flaws. He dismisses the numerology and supposed ancient messages— particularly as presented by Armando Meli and Malanga —as “absolute complete nonsense”, undermining any defense that these researchers were forced into a quirky, alien-obsessed platform like Nicole Chicolo’s due to academic ostracism. If that were true, the author argues, their presentation should have been impeccable, not riddled with unprofessionalism that aligns too comfortably with the conference’s fringe context. Speaker two (Filipo Bjondi), focused on the sonar-satellite technology, fared slightly better in his assessment, but the author questions its validation—tested on a dam and mountain tunnels, not comparable subterranean depths—and Malanga’s proud claim that it “costs nothing” rings hollow when they fail to apply it convincingly to known underground sites. The author challenges them to prove its reliability in Giza-like conditions, noting unresolved issues like water interference. While open to the possibility that the scans detected something—perhaps remarkable structures like glass-lined stone pipes or even titanium—the author remains unconvinced without physical proof, wary of the presenters’ book-selling motives and Malanga’s wild assertions.

     * He launched his main channel, "Metatron" (currently 972K subscribers), in 2013. On it, where he explores topics like medieval history, Roman military history, and linguistic insights, often with a team of experts including archaeologists and historians. Urbani, originally a university language teacher with a background in Asian languages and history, transitioned to full-time content creation after his channel gained traction. He’s multilingual, speaking languages such as Italian, English, Japanese, Latin, and others, which he sometimes showcases. he has built a following of nearly 1 million subscribers on his main channel by March 2025, uploading frequently to keep his audience engaged.

+ "Man this guy REALLY loves the expression "porca puttana" (lit. swine slut. Kind of like holy shit in English but more vulgar). He must have said it at least 20 times. He also says "cazzo" a lot (lit. dick)" [Metatron on a paper presented at a conference].

The "Books of Thoth"

The  Books of Thoth are mythical books that were supposedly written and left on earth by the Egyptian god Thoth, in which are found the mysteries of the heavens and predictions of future planetary events. The books contain spells of both dark and white magic, secrets of other worlds (dimensions) and instructions on how to gain immortality. The power and strength of these books is so immense that it can control both the power of all the elements and even the gods themselves. These prophetic texts were supposedly hidden in secret Egyptian libraries and are now missing. The church father Clement of Alexandria, in the sixth book of his work Stromata, mentions forty-two books used by Egyptian priests which, he says, contain "the whole philosophy of the Egyptians". All these books, according to Clement, were written by Hermes (the Greek name for Thoth). Among the subjects they cover are hymns, rituals, temple building, astrology, geography, and medicine.  According to some theories, these texts are hidden in a secret chamber located beneath the Sphinx of Giza .

A mention of a Book of Thoth appears in an ancient Egyptian short story from the Ptolemaic period known as "Setne Hamwas and Naneferkaptah" or "Setne I". In it, the book, written by Thoth contains two spells, one that allows the reader to understand the language of animals, and the other that allows the reader to see the gods themselves (Lichtheim 2006, pp. 125–128).

Egyptologists Richard Louis Jayshaw and Karl-Theodor Zauzich have called a long Egyptian text from the Ptolemaic period the "Book of Thoth". This Demotic text , known from more than forty fragmentary copies, consists of a dialogue between a person called "He-who-loves-knowledge" and a figure whom Jayshaw and Zauzich identify as Thoth. The topics of their conversation include the work of scribes , various aspects of the gods and their sacred animals, and the Duat , the realm of the dead (Jasnow, and Zauzich 2005 pp. 2–9, 72–73). 

In recent centuries there have been many citations of this work, such as as in the case of the British occultist Aleister Crowley, who  published his version of The Book of Thoth in 1944 (describing the philosophy and use of the 'Thoth tarot'). It is mentioned in many other instances in popular culture, for example in the manga JoJo's Bizarre Adventure or in the case of the writer-journalist Jacques Bergier in The Cursed Books. In the 1932 film The Mummy , Thot's writing contains a magic formula that resurrects the dead.

References

Jasnow, Richard Lewis; Karl-Theodor Zauzich  2005 . The Ancient Egyptian Book of Thoth: A Demotic Discourse on Knowledge & Pendant to Classical Hermetica . Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. ISBN  9783447050821 .

 Lichtheim, Miriam (2006) [1st. Pub. 1978]. Ancient Egyptian Literature, Volume III: The Late Period . University of California Press. ISBN  0-520-24844-9 .

"The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean"

Distinct from the (authentic) brief Hermetic text known as the Emerald Tablet, this work is a pseudohistorical volume penned by Maurice Doreal (1898–1963), a cult figure who established the Brotherhood of the White Temple in 1930 (https://brotherhoodofthewhitetemple.com/). Released in the 1940s or early 1950s—likely prior to 1953—this book draws inspiration from ancient Egyptian lore and the eerie, reptilian-themed tales of H. P. Lovecraft (1890–1937). It explores themes such as Atlantis, a mysterious race of serpent-faced beings, alchemy, and a broad spectrum of mystical subjects. Its creation coincided with the surge of the Theosophical movement and the growing fascination with Lovecraft’s fictional universe. Doreal falsely asserted that his book was a translation of ancient tablets he had discovered within the Great Pyramid of Giza in 1925, a claim that fuelled its mystique. Deespite the prevailing colonial attitudes, the act of removing them from the site at this time would have been illegal. Influenced by occult Egyptian writings, including the Emerald Tablet and the legendary Book of Thoth, Doreal’s work later became a key reference for David Icke, a notable advocate of the Reptilian conspiracy theory.

Structured into 15 tablet-like chapters, the text unfolds through enigmatic poetry, touching on alchemy, the essence of the cosmos, spiritual insights, the lost city of Atlantis, and philosophical musings.

Contents:
 

1. The History of Thoth, The Atlantean
2. The Halls of Amenti
3. The Key of Wisdom
4. The Space Born
5. The Dweller of Unal
6. The Key of Magic
7. The Seven Lords
8. The Key of Mysteries
9. The Key of Freedom of Space
10. The Key of Time
11. The Key to Above and Below
12. The Law of Cause and Effect and The Key of Prophecy
13. The Keys of Life and Death
14. Atlantis
15. Secret of Secrets

 

Kensington Runestone Geology Accusations

I found this quite helpful, Harold Edwards 2020 'The Kensington Runestone: Geological Evidence of a Hoax' The Minnesota Archaeologist https://academia.edu/45218145/The_Kensington_Runestone_Geological_Evidence_of_a_Hoax but ex-TV presenter Scott Wolter ( @RealScottWolter · 6h) reckons "

Edwards is a complete fraud and a failed academic. I hired him out of sympathy 25 yrs ago. My partners and I had to walk him out of the building for incompetence and insubordination. His KRS work is garbage or it’d be published in a geological journal not archaeology".

What? So what is the underlying geology of the findspot and the area 1 km or so around? What is "wrong" (or "fraudulent") with his geological reasoning here? It looks pretty plausible to me the systematic and evidence-based way it is presented here. Why would you publish specialist analysis of an archaeological artefact (if that's what this is) tucked away in some geological journal where it would not be seen by archaeologists just because it is a "stone"? I asked if this text is 'wrong', was a critical review of this article ever published, in a geological journal maybe? Scott Wolter (@RealScottWolter · 40m) replies scathingly and illogically:

It’s not worthy of critical review, it is that bad. And people in our community know exactly what’s going on with Harold. He filed complaints against me in 38 states that we filmed episodes of America Unearthed. That’s how obsessed with hatred he is..

.This is rather odd, I asked about a petrography report on a stone, Woltter seems to identify himself with that stone... He continues ( Scott Wolter @RealScottWolter)

Because it doesn’t make sense. He He knows it’s intentional deception that’s why it’s published in archaeological term, not the geological one. It wouldn’t have been accepted.

Whoah. This is getting wild. My reply:

I've read it and dont see why you claim it "makes no sense", it presents the case and the evidence very carefully, &leads to the conclusion in a perfectly logical manner. What specifically needs to be change to "make it make sense"? Are you saying evidence is "falsified" or what?

"Handbags"

Jason Wilde @JasonWilde108 photographer from Ontario thinks he's onto something:

The mysterious “handbag” motif is a recurring symbol found across various ancient civilizations, all sharing a similar design despite large geographical distances and thousands of years of separation. This motif is generally depicted as a rectangular object with a rounded top and a handle, resembling a modern-day handbag. What makes this motif fascinating to me is how closely its design resembles itself across cultures, suggesting either a shared concept or a global diffusion of a significant idea. Artifacts showing this motif have been discovered in places like Göbekli Tepe, Jiroft, Mesopotamia, and Mesoamerica, each depicting similar stylistic features despite differences in artistic mediums.

A chronological breakdown of the handbag motif starts with Göbekli Tepe (Turkey, circa 9600 BCE), where carvings of handbag-like shapes are engraved on T-shaped stone pillars, appearing to be held by divine figures or suspended as ritual symbols. Following this, the motif appears in Jiroft, Iran (circa 2500 - 2200 BCE), where chlorite vessels and carvings found at Konar Sandal display similar objects, often associated with mythological beings or ceremonial scenes. Around the same time, the Sumerians and Akkadians of Mesopotamia (circa 2500 - 2000 BCE) also depicted these handbags in their reliefs, usually held by divine figures like the Anunnaki, often shown in conjunction with the Tree of Life. Later, the motif appears in the Neo-Assyrian period (circa 900 - 600 BCE), prominently featured in palace reliefs, again in the hands of divine beings or priests.

The same motif resurfaces thousands of miles away in Mesoamerica, particularly among the Olmecs (circa 1200 - 400 BCE), where similar objects are depicted on ceremonial stelae and statues held by priestly or god-like figures.

Despite differences in cultural context, the handbags are almost always depicted as objects of importance carried by divine or significant figures. The consistency in design...a rectangular base with a rounded top and handle...is too precise to be coincidental. It suggests to me either a shared symbolic meaning or perhaps an item of practical or ceremonial use that ancient cultures regarded as sacred or essential. Whether this motif represents a common technological tool, a symbolic container of spiritual power, or something else entirely remains a mystery to me, but the fact that such a unique object appears in nearly identical form across distant and unrelated civilizations is a mystery that I think deserves a second look.

So these representations of bags/pouches/busckets are found in various places, but there is not a single preserved item of this kind, anywhere. This could mean that they are an abstract symbol rather than an object. Anyway they are found in the Near East in three peroods 9000BC, 2500/2000 BC and 900/600BC. That is hardly evidence of anything like continuity or a connection between them. We are talking about the same gaps as between Cheddar Caveman, Stonehenge 3b and Soshenq II succeedings Osorkon I as king of Egypt. Rather a wide span. As for appearing the other side of teh Atlantic, among the Olmecs, even later it is even more far fetched. Especially if you look at the areas (vast areas) between them where NO depictions of this type are seen. This is grasping at straws with the "looks like" paradigm.

Petroglyphic "looks-like"

The New Gnostics @BCEsupernova
Left Utah North America:
Up to 5000 years old

Right Siberia Khakassian:
5000 years old

Is this evidence of pre-Columbian, transoceanic transfer of information? Aka Atlantis? Or something much more?

Well, is it? How would you test that? DID you?

Archaeology Exposed -

Archaeology Exposed - Wandering Wolf Productions
my article is featured in ‪@QuiteFrankly‬ newsletter w/a full video release mid-March covering what I write about here ⬇️ See the dirty secrets behind some of the world’s 🌎 most famous sites exposed after a decade of travel & documenting

"Looks Like" a Sunken City off Cuba's Coast

In 2000-2001 there was some discussion of some images retrieved by echo-sounding of the seabed off the coast of the Guanahacabibes Peninsula in Pinar del Río, a province of Cuba. The images resembled, some said, stone structures with certain geometric features that could lead to their interpretation as the ruins of ancient human constructions. 

 The feature was first identified in 2000 by a team led by marine engineer Paulina Zelitski and her husband Paul Weinzweig, owners of the Canadian company Advanced Digital Communications (ADC), which was conducting seafloor surveys in collaboration with the Cuban government. In 2001, the team conducted further exploration using sonar, detecting regular geometric formations covering an area of approximately 20 km² at depths ranging from 600 to 750 meters. An underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) equipped with video captured images of what appeared to be circular and pyramid-like structures, possibly made from massive granite blocks. Zelitski described the formations as "a truly marvelous structure that really does resemble a large urban centre. However, it would be totally irresponsible to say what it is until we have proof". The depth rather precludes them being anthropogenic. No further studies have confirmed the existence of the feature or expanded upon the original findings. 

Despite that a rambling You Tube video by Dan Richards seems to think they are traces of a lost ancient civilization that he somehow (how?) dates to 50kYBP.... “The Sunken City off Cuba’s Coast: Atlantis or Anomaly?”, the mystery remains unresolved."The Sunken City off Cuba's Coast: Atlantis or Anomaly?"The Cuban Underwater Structure