Giza - The Pyramids and the Temporal Gateway Conference 16th March 2025

This is about a video that provides quite a useful summary of the long conference presenting "Le piramidi e la porta del tempo [Giza - The Pyramids and the Temporal Gateway]" with massive underground structures supposedly discovered under the Khafre pyramid by remote sense=sing. The author of the video summary (You Tuber Raffaello Urbani, an Italian creator known for his focus on [real] history, languages, video games, but also medieval weapons and armour) sets out to meticulously dissect and summarise the whole thing in a 35 minute delivery.

This conference lasted nearly four hours and was held on March 16, 2025, at the Hotel Artem Congress. It featured three speakers— Armando Meli, Filipo Bjondi, and Corado Malanga and was presented on the YouTube channel "Expedition Nicole Chicolo".  

      Pottymouth pseudoarchaeologist            

              professor, Corado Malanga   

       

As a native Italian speaker, the author watched the entire event, which drew 900 spectators and sold out tickets, and in this video aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of every word, sentence, rhetorical flourish, and claim made during the proceedings. The goal is to unpack how the speakers presented their findings (allegedly groundbreaking revelations about "hidden truths no one else dared to investigate") down to the minutest detail, while maintaining an open mind despite the questionable context surrounding the event. The author clarifies what was actually said, separating fact from the sensationalized sci-fi interpretations (like pyramids as power plants or underground cities) that have since circulated on platforms like TikTok and YouTube, often without scrutiny. Specifically, the author examines the speakers’ references to the "city of Amenti", the justifications for their claims (noting the first speaker’s completely “ludicrous” numerological reasoning), and an alternative purpose for the pyramids proposed by Malanga, the final and most prominent speaker. With a mix of sarcasm and sincerity, the author delivers an unflinching, detailed breakdown of the conference’s content, presentation, and underlying implications, all while highlighting the historical weight the organizers themselves attributed to it, hyperbolic claims of rewriting humanity’s remote past.

I Watched The 4 Hours Conference Of The Pyramids Of Giza In Italian...It's WILD!

.

Posted on You Tube by Metatron 82,998 views Mar 29, 2025 

In it, Raffaello Urbani launches into a scathing critique of the first speaker, Armando Meli, whose presentation begins at minute 11:34 of the original Italian video and stretches over an hour and two minutes, earning him the distinction of being the author’s least favourite of the three. Tasked with introducing the origins of their research project on the Giza plateau, Meli instead delivered a chaotic mess of metaphysical musings—rambling about spirit, mind, and destiny— rather than a coherent foundation or presentation of the project. Urbani finds his methodology utterly disjointed and his rhetoric abysmal, exemplified by his claim that meeting the other researchers was no mere chance but a pre-ordained event, as “chance doesn’t exist”, a statement he just tosses out. 

Meli’s wild assertions escalate as he casually re-dates the structures on the Giza plateau to 36,400 BC, offering only a flimsy justification about considering “other temples” beyond the pyramids and Sphinx, with no further elaboration. His presentation grows increasingly unhinged as he declares a sarcophagus to be a 'bathtub' without explanation, then pivots to decoding the “civilization’s” communication through numbers, despite no evidence of a civilization existing at that time. Focusing on the Valley Temple, May concocts a bizarre numerical interpretation—arbitrarily assigning meaning to a corridor as “three,” 16 columns as “seven,” and a niche as “one”—to arrive at “137,” which he later flips to “371” as an “anagram” symbolizing “the transcendent form of man reincarnating,” a leap the Urbani deems dishonest and nonsensical. He further ties these fabricated numbers, like 432, to spacetime and immortality, claiming they hint at something beneath Giza, a conclusion built on cherry-picked elements and wild speculation. When Meli introduces the "Emerald Tablets" and the "City of Amenti"— dismissing academia’s skepticism as a cover-up— his team’s amateurish reinterpretation of the texts reeks of modern pseudo-New Age projection, devoid of linguistic or historical rigour. The author excoriates May’s approach as unprofessional, accusing him of projecting baseless modern ideas onto ancient contexts to prop up his ludicrous claim of a hidden city, leaving the presentation a shambles of unjustified leaps and interpretive chaos.

The  second speaker, Filipo Bjondi, has a presentation kicks off at 1 hour and 4 minutes and drags on until 1 hour and 52 minutes, earning him the title of the “best” of the trio— though this is faint praise, as the author deems these 50 minutes the most tedious of the conference, especially after the first speaker’s disastrous introduction.

Bjondi focuses on the technology behind their claims, boasting of a novel technique using two low-orbit satellites to generate SAR imaging, but with a twist: instead of conventional methods, they employ sonar— sound vibrations captured from space and interpreted with AI assistance. Urbani, while admitting to be no tech expert, finds this explanation riddled with issues, starting with Bjondi’s use of grandiose jargon that obscures a shaky foundation. He claims this method allows unprecedented underground scans, but Urbani is skeptical, noting that the logical process tying the tech to their conclusions is flimsy and unconvincing. 

At 1 hour and 20 minutes, Bjondi veers into a bizarre tangent, declaring “the heretic thought always wins” (linking “error” to “air” and “liberty” in a nonsensical etymological leap the author dismisses as fabricated fluff). On the technical front, he describes transmitting electromagnetic impulses to capture echoes from beneath the earth, yet when he addresses validation at 1 hour and 44 minutes, the author finds it sorely lacking. Bjondi cites tests on the Grand Sasso tunnels and the Mosul Dam, claiming their scans accurately mapped known pathways and tunnels—pointing to visuals of blue lines and red zones allegedly corresponding to real structures. However, Urbani tears into this as insufficient proof: Bjondi never specifies the depth of these scans, a critical omission when they later claim to detect structures 648 to 1,200 meters beneath Giza! Without altitude data or evidence of precision at such depths, the author finds the methodology unprofessional and the presentation a dull, unpersuasive slog— failing to bridge the gap between intriguing tech and credible results, leaving their bold claims dangling without rigour or substance., 

The author then addresses the presentation of the third speaker, Corado Malanga, the supposed “big guy” of the conference. His presentation begins at 1 hour and 52 minutes and quickly spirals into a mix of absurdity and unprofessionalism that the author finds both fascinating and deeply flawed. Malanga starts by admitting he and his team initially understood nothing from their sonar-derived satellite images, relying on colours to indicate vibrations, materials, and depths. His methodology takes a nosedive at 2 hours and 33 minutes when he identifies underground structures shaped like tuning forks (“diapason”), linking this to their sonar technique in a leap of “fate” the author deems laughably unprofessional—suggesting ancient intent from 36,400 years ago guided this discovery.

Malanga’s claims grow wilder as he describes empty “glass” tubes, calculated at 648 meters deep based on a stretched pyramid image and pixel ratios, a process the author finds dubious and poorly explained (especially his casual “a pixel is a pixel” dismissal). At 2 hours and 55 minutes, he introduces the technique's overreliance on AI to interpret results, asserting it is somehow immune to biases and flaws and thus validates their shapes (tubes, cubes) as real. The author excoriates this as a lazy cop-out, noting Malanga’s naive belief that “AI never gets anything wrong,” repeated thrice, betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of AI’s interpretive limits. 

Malanga’s numerology adds to the chaos, tying 648 meters to 324 (space-time axes) and 162 (near the golden ratio), which the author dismisses as baseless number-juggling akin to the first speaker’s antics. Finally, at 3 hours and 9 minutes, he posits these “cubes” as the “rooms of Amenti,” claiming at 3 hours and 27 minutes they’re structural supports preventing the pyramid’s sinking—a theory lacking evidence or rigour. He says that the black square at the complex’s base might be tungsten, a bold assertion he justifies solely by its colour and lack of vibration, offering no substantive evidence. By 3 hours and 47 minutes, his speculative leaps continue unchecked, culminating in a sales pitch for signed books as the conference wraps up, a move the author notes with skepticism given the presenters’ financial incentives.

The author paints Malanga’s presentation as a trainwreck of interpretive overreach, sloppy execution, and unjustified confidence, propped up by misused tech and conspiracy-laden bluster, leaving his grand conclusions unconvincing and his status as the “genius” thoroughly undermined.

Urbani then sums up the entire conference with a blend of intrigue and scathing critique, reflecting on its esoteric tone and glaring methodological flaws. He dismisses the numerology and supposed ancient messages— particularly as presented by Armando Meli and Malanga —as “absolute complete nonsense”, undermining any defense that these researchers were forced into a quirky, alien-obsessed platform like Nicole Chicolo’s due to academic ostracism. If that were true, the author argues, their presentation should have been impeccable, not riddled with unprofessionalism that aligns too comfortably with the conference’s fringe context. Speaker two (Filipo Bjondi), focused on the sonar-satellite technology, fared slightly better in his assessment, but the author questions its validation—tested on a dam and mountain tunnels, not comparable subterranean depths—and Malanga’s proud claim that it “costs nothing” rings hollow when they fail to apply it convincingly to known underground sites. The author challenges them to prove its reliability in Giza-like conditions, noting unresolved issues like water interference. While open to the possibility that the scans detected something—perhaps remarkable structures like glass-lined stone pipes or even titanium—the author remains unconvinced without physical proof, wary of the presenters’ book-selling motives and Malanga’s wild assertions.

     * He launched his main channel, "Metatron" (currently 972K subscribers), in 2013. On it, where he explores topics like medieval history, Roman military history, and linguistic insights, often with a team of experts including archaeologists and historians. Urbani, originally a university language teacher with a background in Asian languages and history, transitioned to full-time content creation after his channel gained traction. He’s multilingual, speaking languages such as Italian, English, Japanese, Latin, and others, which he sometimes showcases. he has built a following of nearly 1 million subscribers on his main channel by March 2025, uploading frequently to keep his audience engaged.

+ "Man this guy REALLY loves the expression "porca puttana" (lit. swine slut. Kind of like holy shit in English but more vulgar). He must have said it at least 20 times. He also says "cazzo" a lot (lit. dick)" [Metatron on a paper presented at a conference].