Jimmy Corsetti and Hobo Dan Apparently CANNOT READ

The body language says it all, Gorsetti
 is an uncouth insufferable boor 

One would have thought that a US "researcher" investigating (sic) "lost mysteries of the past" would at least try to keep a little abreast of the basic historical outline... On the deliberately-provocative scandal-profiteering podcast "Piers_Morgan uncensored", Jimmy Gorsetti speaks unbelievably disrespectfully (and with a total lack of understanding about inter-cultural norms) to a brown-skinned Egyptologist, INFORMING him:

after the pyramid's construction, there was three other changes of kingdom within Egypt. Old kingdom, Middle Kingdom, New Kingdom, and between them are missing chapters of human history within Egypt. For example, between the Old Kingdom and the Middle Kingdom is approximately 126 years of completely missing history. It's conjecture. We think that it may have been a revolt within Egypt, a civil war, but something happened to completely overthrow the Fourth Dynasty going into the Fifth Dynasty. And then between the Middle Kingdom and the New Kingdom is approximately 186 years of missing history. So the point that I'm making is that within each of those two chapters of missing history, that's longer than any human lifespan. It's multiple generations whch means that nobody was alive afterwards to say what was happening before. We have absolutely no idea how the pyramids were constructed, how or even precisely when.

Actually Gorsetti, almost every one of your "Usborne Children's Guide to Ancient Egypt" factoids is wrong or misremembered (the leather-bound volumes behind you are clearly as fake as your understanding of ancient history). And you have the impertinence to address anyone like that. If you were talking like that to me and the La-di-da-stuck-up-English moderator refused to react, I'd do more than just lose my temper with you as Hawass did, provoked by your impudence... Didn't your parents teach you any manners?

Another of Morgan's anti-Hawass guests, Dan Richards announces that he is graciously giving the brown-skinned Egyptologist an opportunity to "vindicate himself" (having already accused him of ignorannce). He gives him, as he put it, a second chance. I am not surprised that Dr Hawass brushed him off and refused to discuss anything with the supercillious bearded weirdo he was confronted with with his total lack of manners and trailer-park mannerisms. And as he says, Richards jumped in with this question in the middle of another discussion and his gottcha has absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic under discussion! Richards seems unaware of the copious literature on slavery in the ancient world. No surprise there.

Disgraceful exhibition.

But look at the comments underneath, a bunch of haters are chortling and mud-slinging. This is not any kind of debate with the Hancockians, but a hatefest.