Questions and answers:
Jimmy Corsetti @BrightInsight6 7:21 PM · Oct 22, 2025The archaeological team investigating the site has already made clear the reason. The pillar is a structural part of another archaeological feature. Maybe in the near future we can have a way to reveal all the pillar's motifs without compromising the structure. But a US YouTuber thinks he knows better:
The most debated aspect of ALL of Gobekli Tepe is without a doubt, T-Pillar 43, BUT, did you know that it’s never been *fully* seen or documented? ๐คฏ
WHY won’t archaeologists simply remove it so the *entire* Pillar and its unseen imagery can be documented and studied???
"Jimmy Corsetti @BrightInsight6 8:40 PM · Oct 22, 2025·
That’s trash ๐️
There is ZERO reason to not excavate Pillar 43.
How you could be an archaeologist and be content with this highlights why this once great Field is self destructing ๐๐ป"
Jimmy Corsetti @BrightInsight6 · Oct 22
Are you crazy?? We absolutely have the capability to safely remove this pillar before dinner tonight


No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep it civil and clean. Don't attack other posters. No anonymous contributors please (and remember the comments are for making a contribution to the discussion) terms as here: [ https://paul-barford.blogspot.com/2010/12/note-to-comment-posters.html ]
Thanks