That Twisty old Archaeology

     The Timelords of Archaeon, Big Archaeology's governing body in action

Here's a guy who never trained or worked in archaeology, but knows all about that archaeology-stuff

William Smith  @4gottn_History  22h
If the discovery of a SECOND SPHINX is true, it wouldn't change the accepted narrative.  Egyptologists would make sure of that.

Dunning-Kruger drawing on toxic Hancock-hostility, and a reply is no better:

Megalithic Mysteries @Megalithic12000  14h
They would absolutely (sic) try.

That's what institutions do when the evidence contradicts the framework. They reshape the evidence, not the framework.

But here's what's different now.

Ten years ago they could dismiss this as fringe speculation. Today there are SAR scans showing anomalies beneath the mound.

A geologist traced geometric alignments that land directly on it. Egyptian and independent researchers have reached the same conclusion separately.

The data is |(sic) public. The satellite imagery is public. The theological texts have always been public.

Mainstream archaeology has burned through its credibility by gatekeeping for decades. Telling people what they're seeing isn't real. Refusing to investigate sites that don't fit the timeline.

If a second Sphinx is confirmed after years of being told it was nonsense, it won't just rewrite Giza.

It will be the moment a generation of people stops giving the establishment the benefit of the doubt entirely.

.